Understanding the Difference Between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in Native Account Abstraction
According to reports, zkSync posted an article on social media explaining the difference between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in terms of native account abstraction. zkSync stated that
According to reports, zkSync posted an article on social media explaining the difference between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in terms of native account abstraction. zkSync stated that in order to avoid hard forking, EIP-4337 made some compromises, such as external owned accounts (EOA) and account abstractions (AA), separate transaction streams, separate memory pools, separate authenticator/binder roles, and external owned accounts that cannot use Paymasters, ZkSync has improved EIP-4337 by integrating account abstraction at the protocol level, and the above functions can be implemented.
ZkSync: EIP-4337 Compromises to Avoid Hard Bifurcation
As the blockchain ecosystem continues to evolve, there are always new proposals and ideas being put forward by developers to improve the system. One such proposal is EIP-4337 and its evolution in zkSync Era, intended to enhance native account abstraction. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between these two approaches and how they impact the overall blockchain system.
Introduction
– Explanation of EIP-4337
– Explanation of zkSync Era
External Owned Accounts (EOAs)
– How EIP-4337 handles EOAs
– How zkSync improves upon EIP-4337’s handling of EOAs
Account Abstractions (AAs)
– How EIP-4337 introduces AAs
– How zkSync incorporates AAs at the protocol level
Transaction Streams
– How EIP-4337 uses separate transaction streams
– How zkSync improves upon EIP-4337
Memory Pools
– How EIP-4337 implements separate memory pools
– How zkSync improves upon EIP-4337’s approach
Authenticator/Binder Roles
– How EIP-4337 uses separate authenticator/binder roles
– How zkSync improves upon EIP-4337’s approach
External Owned Accounts and Paymasters
– How EIP-4337 prohibits the use of Paymasters with EOAs
– How zkSync allows the use of Paymasters with EOAs
Conclusion
In conclusion, while EIP-4337 is a valuable contribution to the blockchain ecosystem, zkSync Era goes a step further by integrating account abstraction at the protocol level. This integration eliminates the need for separate transaction streams, memory pools, and authentication binder roles, allowing for a more streamlined approach. Additionally, zkSync Era allows for the use of Paymasters with external owned accounts, providing greater flexibility and versatility.
FAQs
1. What is EIP-4337, and why was it created?
2. How does zkSync improve upon EIP-4337’s handling of external owned accounts?
3. What benefits does account abstraction offer to the blockchain ecosystem?
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/ai/10902.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.