Solana’s Network Outage and the Debate on the Role of Verifier Messages and Online Voting

On February 28, the Twitter user DBCryptoX released a controversial post about the network outage of Solana on February 25, indicating that a large number of v…

Solanas Network Outage and the Debate on the Role of Verifier Messages and Online Voting

On February 28, the Twitter user DBCryptoX released a controversial post about the network outage of Solana on February 25, indicating that a large number of verifier messages and online voting are blocking the network. Anatoly Yakovenko, founder and CEO of Solana Labs, responded that his remarks came from “pure ignorance” and pointed out that as part of the “single large quorum”, voting helps to provide “excellent security, high throughput and low cost” at the same time. However, Yakovenko did not completely refute the claim of DBCryptoX that 90-95% of the transactions on Solana included these verifier messages and on-chain voting, which DBCryptoX believed would help “put the system into trouble”.

Founder of Solana Labs: The statement that voting on the chain causes network disruption is due to “pure ignorance”

Interpretation of the news:


The network outage of Solana on February 25 has sparked a debate on the role of verifier messages and online voting in the blockchain network. DBCryptoX, a Twitter user, released a post claiming that a large number of verifier messages and online voting were blocking the network, putting the system into trouble. Anatoly Yakovenko, the founder and CEO of Solana Labs, responded that DBCryptoX’s remarks came from “pure ignorance” and that voting is a crucial part of the network’s “single large quorum” that provides excellent security, high throughput, and low cost.

However, Yakovenko did not entirely dismiss DBCryptoX’s claim that 90-95% of transactions on Solana included these verifier messages and on-chain voting. This raises concerns about the extent to which verifier messages and online voting are contributing to the network’s performance or hindering it.

At the heart of this debate is the trade-off between security, throughput, and cost. Solana’s design is based on a “single large quorum” consensus algorithm that handles a large number of transactions in parallel. This enables the network to achieve high throughput – up to 65,000 transactions per second – while keeping the cost low. However, this design also relies on a high level of participation from validators who are responsible for verifying transactions and participating in online voting.

Verifier messages and online voting play a crucial role in maintaining the network’s integrity and security. Verifier messages are used to verify the authenticity of transactions and ensure that no malicious actors are trying to manipulate the network. Online voting is used to resolve conflicts and reach a consensus on which transactions should be added to the blockchain.

However, the high volume of verifier messages and online voting may also have unintended consequences. Critics argue that they can create bottlenecks and delays, leading to a slower network and increasing the risk of network congestion or even outages. Moreover, the high dependence on validators could also create a potential centralization risk, making the network more vulnerable to attacks.

In conclusion, the debate on the role of verifier messages and online voting in Solana’s network outage underscores the balance between security, throughput, and cost in blockchain design. While verifier messages and online voting may help maintain the network’s integrity and security, their high volume may also create unintended consequences that may affect the network’s performance. As the blockchain industry continues to evolve, striking a balance between security, throughput, and cost will be crucial in ensuring the long-term sustainability of blockchain networks.

References:

https://www.cryptoslate.com/solana-founder-disputes-claim-that-verifiers-are-blocking-the-network/
https://www.coindesk.com/solana-up-tether-down-paired-tokens-tell-opposite-tales-on-crypto-market-shift

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/ai/3925.html

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.