Meitu Announces Impairment Losses on Cryptocurrency Investment
It is reported that Meitu announced on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange that since the purchase of cryptocurrency, the Group has not purchased or sold any cryptocu…
It is reported that Meitu announced on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange that since the purchase of cryptocurrency, the Group has not purchased or sold any cryptocurrency according to the cryptocurrency investment plan. According to the International Financial Reporting Standards, the Group is expected to recognize an impairment loss of about 285 million yuan in the annual performance of the Group as of December 31, 2022 for the purchased cryptocurrency. The impairment loss of the purchased cryptocurrency hedges the impact of the fair value gains of some financial assets measured at fair value and the changes of which are included in the current profit and loss on the net profit of the group.
Meitu: The confirmed impairment loss of cryptocurrency is about 285 million yuan
Interpretation of the news:
Meitu, a leading Chinese technology company, recently announced on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange that it has not purchased or sold any cryptocurrency since its initial purchase. This announcement may not come as a surprise for some given the volatility and regulatory uncertainties surrounding cryptocurrencies in recent years.
However, the company’s investment in cryptocurrency has not yielded positive results as expected. According to International Financial Reporting Standards, Meitu is expected to recognize an impairment loss of about 285 million yuan in its annual performance reports for the year ending December 31, 2022. This impairment loss is a consequence of the decreased value of the purchased cryptocurrency assets compared to their initial cost.
While the announcement has sparked discussions within the cryptocurrency community, it is important to note that Meitu’s investment plan was linked to hedging the impact of fair-value gains of some financial assets—generally an investment strategy to protect against potential losses. The decline in value of the cryptocurrency hedge did not necessarily result in overall losses for the company.
Meitu’s investment in cryptocurrency highlighted the growing interest in digital assets among traditional corporations. However, this move has not been without controversy. While some have attributed the volatility of cryptocurrencies as a short-term setback, others have criticized the risks of investing in unregulated digital assets that lack clear contractual regulations or history of functioning in markets.
In addition, while financial markets in China have traditionally been restricted, more companies and individuals have shown interest in cryptocurrencies. The government’s recent attitudes towards the sector reflect its support of developing its own digital currency and benefitting from its unique possibilities.
The announcement by Meitu highlights important lessons for companies actively investing in cryptocurrencies. While cryptocurrencies have gained some amount of traction in recent years, it is important for investors to be cautious due to the volatility and regulatory environment surrounding these types of assets.
In conclusion, Meitu’s recent announcement of an impairment loss on cryptocurrency investment reflects the potential volatility of new digital assets such as cryptocurrencies. It is crucial for interested companies to conduct due diligence and be aware of the potential risks before investing.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/daily/1888.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.
Related recommendations
-
Title: Whale Alert: Anonymous Wallets Transfer 5 Million STEEMs to Upbit
On April 6th, according to Whale Alert monitoring, 5 million STEEMs (approximately $1.68 million) were transferred from anonymous wallets to Upbit. Market data shows that the STEEM
-
Kava Network Launches Kava 12 Main Network After Delay
According to reports, Kava Network tweeted that Kava 12 main network was officially launched. It was originally scheduled to be released on January 19, and the…
-
What currency are bcc and btc (the difference between btc and bch)
What currency are bcc and btc? According to Bitcoin Cash website, what currency are Bcc and btc What is Bitcoin Cash (BCC)? Compared with Cryptocurrency such as BTC and XRP, BCC has the following characteristics: 1. Open source protocol 2. Anonymous network, decentralized system without central server or console 3. Completely transparent and irreversible. And this mode allows users to conduct transactions without relying on any intermediaries, without affecting privacy functions and security. Both types of digital assets are supported by a specific blockchain Differences between BTC and BCHIn the past year, the price of BTC tokens has increased by 260%. Compared with Bitcoin Cash (BCH), bch has more room for development, but the difference between the two protocols lies in their differences in varying degrees: 1. Bitcoin Cash is a monetary form based on blockchain technology 2. BCH is a Cryptocurrency that uses Proof of work algorithm to ensure network security Bitcoin ABC is a digital asset that receives…
-
#Huobi Releases User Asset Disposal Plan after POOLZ Attack
On March 29, it was announced that Huobi Huobi released a user asset disposal plan after POOLZ was attacked. In order to reduce the asset losses caused by users purchasing POOLZ to
-
Baron Davis to Launch SLiC Images – A Photography and Video Rights Management Platform Utilizing NFT Technology
It is reported that Baron Davis, a former NBA player and technology entrepreneur, plans to create a photography and video rights management platform SLiC Image…
-
Why blockchain cannot be tampered with (the immutability of blockchain can help identify the source of product fraud)
Why can’t blockchain be tampered with? Why can’t blockchain be tampered with In the computer field, there is a concept called “code readability”, which was invented by Cryptography experts. But before that, some people believed that this was an extremely strange and dangerous technology – that is, immutability So, what are the database technologies that cannot be tampered with today? Its existence is to prevent people from misunderstanding, damaging, or maliciously modifying data about the database. But if there is a method that allows the system to automatically update ledger information or write these contents into blocks for calculation, then this algorithm is: when a new node runs, it must store files and perform operations on it according to rules; Another approach relies on another node to process data, and the node operator should also create new data packets based on their own situation and save them for the next round of network upgrade process, so as to ensure the…
-
Banks Reminded to Apply Risk Management Principles in Dealing with Cryptocurrency Liquidity Risks
It is reported that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Cu…
-
Bankruptcy Judge Allows Binance.US’s Acquisition of Voyager to Proceed Despite US Government Objection
According to reports, a bankruptcy judge ruled in a document submitted to the court on Wednesday that the transaction of Binance. US’s $1 billion bid for Voyager should continue, rejecting the request of the United States government to suspend litigation pending appeal. Bankruptcy Judge: Binance. US’s $1 billion bid for Voyager should continue Analysis based on this information:In recent years, the cryptocurrency market has been rapidly growing, and companies like Binance.US and Voyager have been at the forefront of this growth. Binance.US, a digital asset exchange that operates within the United States, announced its bid to acquire Voyager, a commission-free cryptocurrency trading platform, for approximately $1 billion. However, their acquisition was met with opposition from the United States government, who requested that the litigation be suspended pending appeal. On Wednesday, the bankruptcy judge presiding over the case ruled that the transaction of Binance.US’s $1 billion bid for Voyager should continue, rejecting the United States government’s request. This decision represents a…
-
Regional Banks In The US Suffer Severe Effect From Silicon Valley Bank Incident
On March 14, it was reported that the regional banks in the United States were severely affected by the bank incident in Silicon Valley. On Monday, the share price of Western Alliance Bancorp plunged by more than 80% before the market; The share price of First Republic Bank plummeted 78%, and the share price of PacWest Bancorp fell 53%. Former Chairman of FDIC: Affected by the bank events in Silicon Valley, more banks will go bankrupt in the future Analysis based on this information:The recent bank incident in Silicon Valley has caused severe repercussions for regional banks in the United States. The shares of many regional banks plummeted by more than 50% after the news of the incident broke out. The ramifications of the incident were clearly visible on the shares of Western Alliance Bancorp, First Republic Bank, and PacWest Bancorp, which suffered the most significant losses after the event. On Monday, the share price of Western Alliance Bancorp saw…
-
Grayscale Holdings Reveal Mixed Sentiments in the Crypto Market
According to reports, according to Coinglas data, the current total grayscale holdings amount to 20.674 billion US dollars, and the trust premium rate for mainstream currencies is as follows: BTC, – 40.23%; ETH，–52.64%； ETC，-66.04%； LTC，-43.39%； BCH，27.52%。 The negative premium rate of grayscale Bitcoin Trust rose to 40.23% Analysis based on this information:The latest reports from Coinglas data suggest that Grayscale Holdings currently stand at 20.674 billion US dollars. This may indicate significant interest in cryptocurrencies among investors looking to gain exposure to the digital asset class. However, a closer look at the trust premium rate for certain mainstream currencies reveals that the market’s overall sentiment may be mixed. For instance, while Bitcoin (BTC) is currently in a strong position with a trust premium rate of -40.23%, other currencies like Ether (ETH) and Ether Classic (ETC) are showing negative premium rates of -52.64% and -66.04% respectively. At the same time, Litecoin (LTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) are performing better than ETH…