Judge Bans VPN Use for Sam Bankman-Fried

It is reported that after SBF said that he used private network to watch the Super Bowl game during house arrest, a judge banned Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) from u…

Judge Bans VPN Use for Sam Bankman-Fried

It is reported that after SBF said that he used private network to watch the Super Bowl game during house arrest, a judge banned Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) from using VPN. U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote, “The defendant’s use of VPN will bring many of the same risks as his use of encrypted messages or call applications.” This move was made at the time when SBF’s lawyer and prosecutor negotiated his bail terms. After SBF was accused of contacting potential witnesses in its criminal case, the judge recently banned SBF from using encrypted message applications such as Signal. SBF is also prohibited from contacting current or former FTX employees until his bail conditions are resolved. The lawyer asked Kaplan to extend the deadline for filing new bail conditions to Friday, but the judge refused. According to Kaplan’s order, the opinion on the conditions of SBF bail will be submitted on Wednesday, and the court will hear the debate on this issue on Thursday afternoon.

SBF is prohibited from using VPN, and the bail debate is scheduled to be held on Thursday

Interpretation of the news:


Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the CEO of FTX crypto exchange, has been prohibited from using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) by a U.S. judge during his house arrest. This move was made when his lawyer and prosecutor negotiated his bail terms. Earlier, the judge had banned SBF from using encrypted message applications, such as Signal, due to his alleged contact with potential witnesses. The judge argued that the use of VPN could pose many of the same risks as the use of encrypted messages or call applications.

The ban on VPN usage is seen as a measure to prevent SBF from tampering with evidence or contacting witnesses in the ongoing criminal case against him. According to reports, SBF has been accused of money laundering through FTX, and the government has asked for his extradition to the United States. The allegations against SBF have put a dent in the crypto market, where FTX is a significant player.

The judge has also prohibited SBF from contacting current or former FTX employees until his bail conditions are resolved. The lawyer had requested an extension of the deadline for filing new bail conditions until Friday, but the judge refused. The opinion on SBF’s bail conditions will be submitted on Wednesday, and the court will hear the debate on this issue on Thursday afternoon.

The ban on VPN usage raises concerns about privacy and government surveillance. VPNs are an essential tool for maintaining privacy and security online, especially in countries with strict censorship laws. However, the judge’s decision may be viewed as a necessary measure to prevent SBF from tampering with evidence or contacting witnesses.

In conclusion, the ban on VPN usage for SBF raises many questions about privacy, security, and government surveillance. While VPNs are essential tools for maintaining privacy and security online, the judge’s decision may be seen as a necessary measure to safeguard the ongoing criminal case against SBF. It remains to be seen how this decision will affect SBF’s bail conditions and his overall case.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/daily/414.html

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.